<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Post Release Me, Let Me Go&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/</link>
	<description>Trying to keep my sanity while raising two kids &#38; managing hubby's biz...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: spaguy</title>
		<link>http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>spaguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>I agree with Robert Sanzalone, He says it perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Robert Sanzalone, He says it perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daryl cognito</title>
		<link>http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>daryl cognito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 03:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>I have gone back to add content that I have forgot but not to changes or tweak. I think the post is great the way it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have gone back to add content that I have forgot but not to changes or tweak. I think the post is great the way it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cj</title>
		<link>http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Cj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever changed a post unless it was written with the express belief that I would change it. Such as, a &quot;to do&quot; list - where I later go back and mark off the done items. 

If I were to be in a situation such as this, I would leave the post in tact and write a new one in addition. Simply expanding or re-explaning  how you feel about something is perfectly acceptable. I see no reason why you&#039;d have to remove a blog entry simply for the purpose of sharing more thoughts on a subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever changed a post unless it was written with the express belief that I would change it. Such as, a &#8220;to do&#8221; list &#8211; where I later go back and mark off the done items. </p>
<p>If I were to be in a situation such as this, I would leave the post in tact and write a new one in addition. Simply expanding or re-explaning  how you feel about something is perfectly acceptable. I see no reason why you&#8217;d have to remove a blog entry simply for the purpose of sharing more thoughts on a subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Sanzalone</title>
		<link>http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sanzalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>I  have only &quot;tweaked&quot; my posts if I found a grammatical error - even if it&#039;s days later. I know by then the post has been swept up by Google or any other trolling system BUT, if anyone ELSE comes by to take a look at it, I want to make sure it&#039;s in good order.

I rarely go back and change the content, even if I feel differently or if it is no longer valid.  I have added &quot;Update:&quot; to an addendum, but that&#039;s about the extent of it.

If understand your thoughts about the Cookie Stand and it&#039;s great.  Just leave it mostly the way it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  have only &#8220;tweaked&#8221; my posts if I found a grammatical error &#8211; even if it&#8217;s days later. I know by then the post has been swept up by Google or any other trolling system BUT, if anyone ELSE comes by to take a look at it, I want to make sure it&#8217;s in good order.</p>
<p>I rarely go back and change the content, even if I feel differently or if it is no longer valid.  I have added &#8220;Update:&#8221; to an addendum, but that&#8217;s about the extent of it.</p>
<p>If understand your thoughts about the Cookie Stand and it&#8217;s great.  Just leave it mostly the way it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen Tucker</title>
		<link>http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I didn&#039;t mean to imply he heard the show and we had an argument. We had an argument about something at a different time, I I talked about the core issue of the argument, not the argument itself. He could have just heard the show and used it against me even though it had nothing to do with him.

does that even make sense? Probably not. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I didn&#8217;t mean to imply he heard the show and we had an argument. We had an argument about something at a different time, I I talked about the core issue of the argument, not the argument itself. He could have just heard the show and used it against me even though it had nothing to do with him.</p>
<p>does that even make sense? Probably not. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen Tucker</title>
		<link>http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spaguyswife.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/blog-post-release-me-let-me-go/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>You know, I&#039;ve had Jason go back and remove a segment from the show. In the interest of full disclosure, it wasn&#039;t for the reason that I wasn&#039;t astisfied. It was actually because of an issue I was having with my EX regarding something I had spoken on in the show. In order to avoid him running across the show and the segment and using it as fuel to fan an already raging fire, I had him remove the segment.

I don&#039;t see anything wrong with rewriting the post, however I&#039;d just delete that one and make an entirely new one, otherwise it might not be read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;ve had Jason go back and remove a segment from the show. In the interest of full disclosure, it wasn&#8217;t for the reason that I wasn&#8217;t astisfied. It was actually because of an issue I was having with my EX regarding something I had spoken on in the show. In order to avoid him running across the show and the segment and using it as fuel to fan an already raging fire, I had him remove the segment.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with rewriting the post, however I&#8217;d just delete that one and make an entirely new one, otherwise it might not be read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
